Pages

Sunday, June 16, 2019

Niche wiki


I've moved over to a new site running Dokuwiki. You can check it out here, it's read only unless you register. If you've edited Wikipedia, the php code is almost the same and many of the functions and format are similar. If you haven't edited anything before it's both easy to pickup and fun to do. I'll leave this blog here, as a note to the progression of my thinking over the last ten years. If I find time I'll migrate some of the important articles across. Look forward to seeing you over there. 

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Is Gender binary or a polarity?

I was surprised to see Mike Bird describe gender on Twitter as non-binary. Binary male-female gender can be observed in the world (The overall pattern across large populations groups; physically, historically and socially is binary.) and in Scripture (Gen 1:27), notwithstanding abnormalities (Klinefelter syndrome etc). While gender is empirically observable, it's also subjectively experienced and gender roles, tropes and behaviours are socially constructed. The modern transgender movement has elevated a person's experience and expression of their gender into an objective standard and a political ideology. Christians, while eschewing the politics of that type of ideology, should also have compassion for people with a genuine experience of gender dysphoria or who have struggled with a gender abnormality. You see this principle of generosity in Philip's interaction with the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8. Everyone's bodies have been broken by sin in one way or another and everyone is battling the corruption of sin, so the invitation to follow Jesus and walk in step with the Holy Spirit (Gal 5:25) should be shared without discrimination.
I had assumed this was the evangelical Christian view of gender and so I surprised when I saw this tweet from Mike Bird describing gender as a "polarity" and when I asked him what that meant he answered: "Male and female are the spectrum of sex, but in between you get phenomena like intersex and gender dysophoria." But this seems to be faulty reasoning. Firstly, it denies the widely observable pattern of binary male-female gender. Secondly, Mike Bird makes an inductive argument from exceptions: "intersex and gender dysophoria", rather than a deductive argument from large-scale patterns. A Christian sexual ethic is not built up from subjective individual experiences but imposed from above, for better or for worse, from the larger reality of history, biology and Scripture. You tackle those exceptions, such as "intersex and gender dysophoria", as they arise within a larger objective framework of gender. It's also worth noting that gender, and all its associated tropes arises from the ancient pattern of male-female binary sex.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Two tricks for understanding the Old Testament


I've just finished preaching through the book of Exodus and wanted to share some of my experience preparing for and then preaching from it. Exodus for many people is a foreign country. After Creation and then the stuff about Abraham and his kids, it becomes a bit of a blur of rules, weird stories and bloody sacrifices. Although interestingly, unlike Leviticus, sacrifice is not a big theme in Exodus. If you had to summarise the book into one phrase it would be 'being rescued into God's presence' and forms a magnificent sequel to Genesis. If you're a preacher it also roughly divides into two separate and manageable series', the rescue from Egypt chapters 1-16, and then instructions for living in God's presence chapters 17-40.

One of the advantages of preaching from the Old Testament is you can use its exotic unfamiliarity to create rhetorical tension. The only time this doesn't work is when the material seems both alien and irrelevant. So, for example, everyone is keen to hear how you'll handle the 10 commandments but less interested in the relevance of priestly garments and tabernacle construction. The juicier passages that feature strict regulations, violence or weird rituals can be preached very simply, by presenting the strange potency of the material and then resolving the tension on a case by case basis. (More on that below.) The priestly garments and tabernacle instructions are trickier because you need to highlight our sinful condition first and then show why these things are necessary before finally linking them to their fulfilment in Jesus.

People over-complicate the Old Testament. But here are two tricks that help with preparation and then presenting the rhetoric of the gospel as you understand and apply the Old Testament. Firstly treat the Old Testament like the New Testament or Watership Down or Lord of the Rings or any other great text. Admittedly, the stakes are higher with Scripture, God, the cosmos and life and death.You might read The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli carefully but hopefully, you won't let it change your life! Essentially, you consider the audience, it's meaning and the authorial intent. In other words, what is the text saying to the '1st hearers', us the '2nd hearers', what's the underlying principle and what is the purpose of the passage? You do exactly the same with the New Testament. The second trick is to beware of continuity and discontinuity between the old and new covenants. Some things continue, some things are different. Sometimes it'll be obvious (e.g High Priest), at other times you'll have to hold both in tension (e.g 2nd Commandant). Jesus has completely fulfilled the Law, but it's still a good thing, showing us God's holiness and our own sinfulness, among other things.