Saturday, April 2, 2011
The Carbon Tax debate
1. It will encourage other nations to sign up to the global system of emissions reduction using some sort of mechanism of carbon trading
2. This will also mean Australia will have system in place early in order and so benefit from the introduction of a global system.
3. A carbon tax will reduce (ever so slightly) global carbon emissions.
This is because
1. A (reliable) global system is rapidly on it's way
2. And reducing global carbon emissions will prevent environmental catastrophes.
It is good to introduce a Carbon Tax now even if it means increasing the cost of living.
However even if anthropomorphic climate change is real, there seems to be three substantial and unresolved problems. Firstly isn't there a cost benefit problem here, the cost of living increase being sought won't seem to have much of an impact on global carbon emissions. Furthermore where are the predictions of environmental catastrophes that will result if carbon emissions aren't reduced by a certain amount within a certain time frame? Finally for every global system designed to regulate human behaviour, there's one that's failing, why will this system be any quicker or better?